BRIEF: Just a random accident or attempted ‘hit’… Does it really matter?

An accident or planned ‘disposal event’?

I had a unique experience of Monday May 8th, 2018 which changed my life. I thought you might be interested.

On Monday , the day before this years (2018) Victory Day parade, I had a meeting with the Secretariats’ office of the MFA (Ministry of Foreign Affairs) over the US6370629 and US6393126 patent frauds and I took the normal method I used to get there, the Moscow Metro to the Line 3 Smolenskaya Station. As it happens, in retrospect, Israels Prime Minister Mr. Bibi Netanyehu was also meeting with Russia’s Foreign Minister Mr. Sergey Lavrov in the same building… at that same time.

Dropping Scaffolding on Todd…

On the way from the Station to the Secretariat’s office of the MFA, in passing through an ally behind the station itself, the middle section, and ONLY the MIDDLE SECTION, of the 3-story tall construction scaffolding erected to pain the Station, fell over intact and nearly killed me as it fell. Oddly enough on this instance I was the only one anywhere near it too. As to why it is odd this happened at 11:45AM Moscow time, and there should have been people everywhere there.

This scaffolding which has been safely standing for several months is located in the alley way on the back side of the Station where the local Police park their cars. This was the middle piece of a row of three pieces of standard exterior building scaffoldings, all three stories tall, which have been safely standing for months.

That means the scaffolding has for months survived wind storms and much more severe weather than what was happening (light breezes) on that day, and nothing like “what happened” could have been mechanically possible without “help” in my opinion.

Since after the fall I noticed that the two end pieces were properly anchored to the Building the only way the middle section could fall is if its retainers, safety clips and safety wires and Building tie-down bolts were removed, the only questions in my mind are “who” and what to do about it.

The Moscow Police came quickly – since they park their cars about 15 feet (five meters) further down the alleyway, and since I had only ten minutes to get to the meeting to beat the noon closure of the office in the Secretariat, I took my pictures and left. When I returned the Scaffolding was re-erected and the safety wires which were obviously removed previously, reinstalled.

The setting on Monday May 8th – The Smolenskaya Metro Station

In framing this, in my leaving the Moscow Metro subway station at Smolenskaya I saw what I assumed was a very attractive female “Agent” who appeared to be waiting for me. As noted above, there was a high-profile meeting happening in the same Building complex I was going, so I figured there would be security all over. As noted above, Bibi (Israel’s PM) was meeting with the Foreign Minister, and whenever “he” is in town “they”  (his advance and situational security teams) are everywhere.

Its not the first time they (Intel people) have been interested in me, my IP and the frauds around it control their world. So I see them every now and then, more often these days it seems.

IMHO She was obviously standing there though, left there specifically to send “a message to me who was doing what here”. And I got that message, I got the message…

 

But guys, and you sir… I am not Eddy Snowden. Rather its my IP the US Government and you folks, stole not the other way around. What amazes me is why you would not make an attempt to license, and control the licensing of the fraud-releases for other Nations as well. Bizarre… Numbers 34:14 comes to mind.

Before you folks reading “this message to my Intel friends” write that comment off as paranoid or a Hollywood fiction, you need to understand my role and the patent frauds (US6370629 and US6393126) role in the creation of the FIVE EYES, and all global banking and surveillance.  AKA:

Abbr	Agency	Country
ASD	Australian Signals Directorate	Australia
CIA	Central Intelligence Agency	United States
CSE	Communications Security Establishment	Canada
CSIS	Canadian Security Intelligence Service	Canada
FBI	Federal Bureau of Investigation	United States
GCHQ	Government Communications Headquarters	United Kingdom
GCSB	Government Communications Security Bureau	New Zealand
MI5	The Security Service	United Kingdom
MI6	Secret Intelligence Service	United Kingdom
NSA	National Security Agency	United States

The FIVE EYES and ALL Intelligence Capture today is tied to the US6370629 and US6393126 Patent Matters, and the Seven Illegal copies of US6370629 filed and Abandoned.

Its that simple – no rights to use US6370629, no surveillance, no surveillance, no intel…  The same is true for Banking. No banking no Intel… In fact the entire Empire the Rothschild’s built is tied to these frauds, in that it cannot operate without illegal uses of EP0997808A3 and the rest of the US6370629 methods.

In fact the matter of these frauds has created what I call ANTI-PATENTS and their rights claims. Ones which fabricated a potential to create a real Numbers 34:14 event only this time for the full 99 years in the copyrights that control all Banking, all Cellular Billing, and all Securities Trading Software today, let alone The Weapons represented in this report.

 

As to the US6370629 and US6393126  Patents themselves

Some background, I invented and had stolen from me – the core Timestamping and Location based Service Patents which today control the entire Planet. The US, British, UK, EU (and one would assume that the Israeli) Governments are so deep in this fraud as to be ludicrous. My stolen IP is the glue which connected the layers of everything together today.

Because no Bank anywhere on Earth can operate without this IP, in just the two years the US6370629 IP Frauds happened under Hillary and Bill Clinton’s watch, this set up a threat to the 500 years of work the Banking CABAL which was run at one time by Jacob Rothschild, did to steal control of most State Banks on earth.

 

Again, No Bank can operate without this Intellectual Property, and its all stolen property today.

 

Property Rights set aside in the EU and UK globally: Covering up Glassey’s work

Under key Property Treaties like COE/ECHR Article 1 Protocol 1, and TEFU Article 7, no party may use this IP without paying for it. None have today. So they operate illegally.

Without it – there is no Banking in any form, no Securities, no FX trading, no eCommerce, no eWeapon Systems, no Internet, no nothing using Digital Computers. So it is one of the more important technologies… And yet, you have no idea who I am or what this IP is… because “THEY” dont want you too.

You also don’t know, I also ran a campaign to get my property back which was culminated in the ruling of 14-03629/WHA which judicially perfected the Patent’s Settlement terms, and created a set of requirements for its use in the US,  which the US Government is still blocking the enforcement.

The US Government, as is the European Commission, and Her Majesties Government of the UK, are all still blocking the  criminal prosecution of these – the illegally filed and abandoned instances of US6370629. It is these and in particular the EP0997808A3 Patent Fraud which controls global banking and silly things like Cell Phone Billing operations globally today.

(PATENT FILINGS: Family filing from EPA, AU, BR, CA, EU, KO, JP, & ZA full list of Derivative filings).

 

Back in Hollywood on the Movie Set…

Meanwhile back in this Hollywood scenario,  “Agent Girl” as I will call her, was “waiting for me” at the top of the Escalator when I emerged in the Top Level of the Station. Interestingly enough when I emerged there, there was no one else but the two of us there.

That in and of itself was odd. This is the top of the escalator area of the Smolenskya Metro Station and its usually filled with people.

The meeting was a full eye-contact thing, and that also is unusual here. People tend to stay to themselves, and not visually engage with anyone unless there is some purpose to that. So here engagement was striking, as was she. Very beautiful.

---

To her masters… why didn’t you just have her walk up and ask to talk. She and I could have had coffee or tea and discussed your concerns. Now we sit on the edge of Numbers 34:14, and I mean that sincerely.

---

 

Setting the backdrop – why Scaffolding? Moscow and its renovation for the World Cup events

It is important to understand that Moscow was being renovated for the World Cup so there is massive amounts of Construction happening everywhere. State Buildings are clad in Scaffolding to provide the ability to resurface and paint them in preparation for the city-wide event. Especially the Metro Station.

 

The Scaffolding falls

As I turned and walked out of the Station into the main pathway of people I noticed two other people I would tag as Agents. Its something you learn to do… Figure out who are the state employees. For instance, my contacts at FSB, are very discernible. Same for the other Agencies.

As I turned and walked along the Alleyway to get to the back side of the Tower building that is the Ministry of Foreign Affairs. I also noticed there was NO ONE ELSE alongside me – which is again highly unusual for this time of day.

Just as  I stepped into the alleyway, there was a gust of wind, and as I continued my walk the MIDDLE SCAFFOLDING – A THREE STORY TALL PIECE OF “CONSTRUCTION SCAFFOLDING” SIMPLY FELL OVER, I lept out of its way and it missed my by a couple of feet at most. Maybe half a meter. Neither of the two end pieces fell over, neither of them had any problem. Again, as I said above, this was the middle section of three sections of what should have been properly secured scaffolding.

The Scaffolding is three stories in height. So it has retaining bolts, safety wires and a set of joiner clamps which were all ‘removed’ to facilitate it falling over.

In conclusion…

The ONLY question in my mind – was who tried to either send a message or …?

The answer seems pretty obvious. One of the three KEY GOVERNMENTS – US, UK, OR … – who are directly involved in the ongoing cover-up. US6370629 and US6393126 patent frauds.

BRIEF: The UN Article 27(3): The EP0997808A3 Patent Fraud takes out the UN

Under Article 27(3): Is the UN Security Council legally incompetent to operate? We think so.

Under UN Charter Group V, Article 27(3) (see below)  any member of the UN’s Security Council who is impacted by a Dispute of International Form, is prevented from voting (pretty much on anything stemming from that dispute).

The UN may also not refuse to take notice of a Dispute which involves a member of the Security Council as well. That would be silly if they could, right?

If the Article 27(3) type Dispute pertains to “their uses of computers illegally violating both treaty and court rulings pertaining to those uses”, and those nations do so,  in any and all actions, it (their being blocked from UN Security Council voting) is total in form.

Seriously, think it through… What do Nations not rely on Computers for today? Banking, Voting, Internet and Commerce, and Killing. All tied to the same Computing infrastructure elements.

Article 52(3) and the Pacific Dispute Resolution requirements are fully met by numerous Litigations which refused to review the fraud itself.

As to the application of the 52(3) Pacific Dispute Resolution requirement for invoking 27(3) it is met fully. The Litigations in the US, the refusal of any other Nation to review this legally, and the granting of Judicial Immunity to US Corporations and Weapons resellers, fully supports this claim. %2(3) requirements for a 27(3) voting ban against the US, Great Britain, and France are met fully under 27(3).

As such, no nations involved in the US6370629 Family Frauds or US6393126 Frauds may serve on the UN Security Council “while those frauds persist”. With 52(3) being met fully, there is no way around this.

 

The Fraud itself (US6370629 patents illegally filed in the EU, AU, CA, BR, ZA, JP, and KO  jurisdictions and then being abandoned, and US6370629 properly issuing and becoming the core timestamping patent on earth) broke every computer on the planet. Including Weapons Systems in NATO and all Rome Statute Nations under §8(2)(b)(iv).

 

How is this possible? Ask California’s Governor Moonbeam and Senator Harris!

This allegation and claim emanates from the US63706239 Patent Fraud and and several illegal instances of it which were filed and abandoned. Especially the EP0997808A3 instance, but the others in this chart shown below prevent those nations from serving as well. Those frauds were blocked for criminal prosecution by the current Governor of the State of California (E. Gerry Brown) and his AG (Now Senator) Kamila Harris and her Staff.(See the same chart also in Russian and Chinese).

Because of these still outstanding antitrust matters, no vote from any member of a Nation impacted by those crimes is possible because of the 27(3) controls. Hence, there is no way to serve on the UN Security Council for the US, any member of the EU, Britain and all of those other nations listed in the table above. In the current Security Council that takes six of the fifteen members out cold.

CA: State blocks prosecution as part of High Tech Crime Program!

As to how this all happened, it started in 1999 but expanded in its damages in the late 2000’s culminating in 2011 by a rejection for prosecution in the States High Tech Crime Program. Because of the State, under Governor Brown’s actions as the Attorney General in 2011 and the refusal to prosecute those crimes their effect amplified into what it is today.

A total nightmare for all concerned. Especially since US6370629 controls PDF Document Header Processing, and because the State refused to implement criminal prosecutions we were forced to take it and the USG and many Silicon Valley Companies to USDC in 14-CV-03629/WHA.

Imagine what that does to the USG under Section 508 compliance requirements?

Today, in the case of the US6370629 family frauds, California refused to allow their own California v Beninsig standard, and then The State of California prevented the US6370629 family of frauds inclusion in the High Tech Crime program. (here for your diligence is the Press-release from California DOJ  and  its felony complaint, we demanded be applied. One which California refused to be applied based on their being able to refuse to prosecute any crime they want to protect)

We actually won that case – dont be fooled. The case was dismissed with prejudice which judicially perfected an even more toxic set of use terms for US6370629 and US6393126 than would have been available through simple Patent Infringement litigations.

So now, the world’s computers are controlled by that settlement. Trust me – try and get anyone “inside” to tell you that isnt true. They wont. They just shake their heads and frown.

Meanwhile, Judge Alsup in USDC 14-CV-03629/WHA exempted all seven of the illegally filed and abandoned instances of the US6370629 patent from the settlement. That pe3rfected the criminal antitrust standing as still open.It is the EP0997808A3 patent he exempted from the Settlement causing most of the problem today.

CA: Still trying to block enforcement of the Settlement terms against California and its Companies as perfected in 14-CV-03629/WHA

Even now though, California is actively still trying to block enforcement of the Settlement Terms against the State, State Actors, and all companies operating inside it. See Glassey/McNeil. v California et al, Santa Cruz 17-CV-01908/Burdick for more information.

But since USDC Senior Judge Bill Alsup exempted the foreign patents from the Settlement, and as a derivative of that previous California State refusal to criminally  prosecute and resolve the frauds through that prosecution, and those ongoing actionsby California State to prevent any party being from controlled by the US6370629 Settlement  (either inside the US or externally), this set of criminal actions by the State of California, have (we believe) today made the UN Non-functional.

But its not just the UN, its the EU and its GDPR requirements, and G7 as well. All tied to global antitrust treaties and the frauds which make their participation a crime.

CA: Covering up illegal offshoing – sacking the nations wealth!

Additionally, the State of California blocked criminal enforcement against Silicon Valley Corporations (Apple, Google, Facebook, Microsoft, Oracle et al)  illegally offshoring trillions of dollars of money made from the illicit sale of derivative software products and online services.

This secondary actions raises more questions while the War on Terror rages on and the US spends trillions of taxpayer dollars fighting it. Know what I am referring to here folks?

The Summary Brief

Additionally, because the UN can have input from individuals as testimonial statement before Organs and its own Departments or Entities, the UN (per the terms of Article 8) must accept notice of those claims which could impact Article 27(3) functionality of the UN Security Council.

Here then is a Summary of that Failure (English, Russian, Chinese).

The Larger Brief

That said, we have real concerns that the US6370629 and EP0997808A3 Frauds have invalidated the ability of the current UN Security Council to operate.

Here is our Analysis Brief (English, Russian, Chinese).

Service on the UN itself

These both were electronically served on the Secretary General’s office, the Office of Secretary’s Counsel (OSC) the Honorable Mr. Mathias Eqs. , and UNCITRAL as well. All who have refused to acknowledge receipt of that service through Email.

Now is this ludicrous thing Possible?

How is this nightmare possible? See the briefs – but in a nutshell six of the 15 Nations currently elected including three of the permanent members are parties to the US6370629 Patent Frauds which control all computers, and all systems necessary for military responses. Hence, no possible commerce, voting, or military action is possible without commission of a high-crime by those six members.

The UN and its operations…  Who can serve and interact with the UN ?

Article 8

The United Nations shall place no restrictions on the eligibility of men and women to participate in any capacity and under conditions of equality in its principal and subsidiary organs

VOTING

Article 27

1. Each member of the Security Council shall have one vote.
2. Decisions of the Security Council on procedural matters shall be made by an affirmative vote of nine members.
3. Decisions of the Security Council on all other matters shall be made by an affirmative vote of nine members including the concurring votes of the permanent members; provided that, in decisions under Chapter VI, and under paragraph 3 of Article 52, a party to a dispute shall abstain from voting.

Dispute Resolution

Article 52

(3) The Security Council shall encourage the development of pacific settlement of local disputes through such regional arrangements or by such regional agencies either on the initiative of the states concerned or by reference from the Security Council.

What is the Solution?

What is the Solution? A simple release from those damaged by the frauds and a note of retroactive forgiveness which was offered and refused because the key four commercial parties (APPLE, FACEBOOK, GOOGLE, and MICROSOFT) refused to pay for their illegal uses of the IP which are the basis of this fraud claim today.

MY STORY: For those of you wondering what is going on with the Court stuff

This one is kind of lengthily… so buckle up.

We just filed the Second Amended Complaint in Santa Cruz County 17-CV-01908/Burdick, and the State of California has until 5/28 to respond. Here is the Link to the Filing, and yes, its not the best, but it gets the point across. The Demurer response and notice of proper filing with all State Agencies will hit the Court later this week (July 4th 2018)

The SAC (Second Amended Complaint) and its point

We are simply saying they (The State of California)  are blocking the enforcement of Section 8 of the Settlement Agreement against any and all parties and in doing so they are running either a “Condemnation by Occupation” (the conversion of the property to suit other users) or an “Inverse Condemnation“.

Both models are accurate based on the State’s actions and both entitle Plaintiffs to full compensation from the State of California itself for those losses and other relief.  But today, after the 2016 Ruling from the California Supreme Court, that must be done through Suit.

If proven through the pleadings, in both instances (a Condemnation by Occupation or Inverse Condemnation) Plaintiffs are entitled to be paid by the State for those assets “loss of use” on a yearly basis for the full terms of their enforcement.

That term for the original Patents (both US6370629 and US6393126) is 20 years, i.e. until 2022 and for copyrights derived from those various patents until sometime in 2100 time frame. The Copyrights effective protection being good for 99 years.

The derivative patents have to be factored into that as well. There are 275 from US6370629 and 105 from US6393126 we are aware of and more issuing monthly.

Illegal Offshoring covered-up for alleged Political Contributions

In its Condemnation through Occupation, another of our key claims is that California covered up “illegal conduct in parties offshoring trillions of dollars which belongs in California State Banks”. You need to understand the damage that causes California and the US as a Nation.

Covering up of the State’s responsibility to fully implement Section 8 programs as well.

One of the other key aspects of this suit, is that while the Settlement’s exist, the State is required to implement its own Section 8 program which will cost a significant amount of money. Money the state simply doesn’t want to budget for this use. One which will have impact on State Tax Programs, State Voting Practices, and the operations of all Microsoft and related Computer Systems in the State’s offices. The impact is sweeping and costly to address.

The Seven Evil Sisters – Judicial Immunity for frauds committed in seven jurisdictions

…And then of course there are the seven illegally filed and abandoned instances outside the US (AP, BR, CA, EU, JP, KO, and ZA). They complicate the mater even more now in the Post Oil States ruling days, but pertain to Judicial Immunity granted to State Actors for their conduct selling IP outside of the Section 8 requirements into these Jurisdictions. An Act the State of California is fully complicit in its actions.

Anytime any product or online service using any US6370629 based methods,  is sold or used in these Jurisdictions, those cause a fraud loss in the US which California has given Judicial Immunity for said offshored Conduct. That causes us a damage in those Jurisdictions which California is liable for as well. This is all pretty simple.

The real issue is why… and who they (The State of California) are doing this for?

The real issue the public needs to understand are why the State would do this? and who they are doing it for? Who paid who?

This matter, as it happens, directly pertains to “the illegal offshoring of several Trillion US Dollars in earnings which were diverted from California Corporate, Taxes, Federal Taxation, and California Banks”. Money’s which everyone knows under the Double-Irish COST OF GOODS SOLD frauds, were diverted to the Isle of Jersey (late of Bermuda/Bahamas) by several key Tech Sector players (including Apple, Facebook, Google, Microsoft, et al).

Why for instance, would the Governor, the AG, and Senator Harris want California (and visa vie the US) trashed like that?

That is a key question we think should be asked. “Why do they want to hurt all of you (and us) so much”? We plan to ask the Judge that very question in our Closing Statement/Argument.

The impact of “Oil States Energy Products v Greene’s Energy Products” – the US Franchise Standards Ruling

Its also very important to figure out how the April 25th 2018 ruling from SCOTUS in “Oil States” figures into this since its key now. Our assertion is that this opens the recovery of that offshored Double-Irish money in full for any patent which software royalties were paid against, in a number of instances. If true, it is HUGE.

Most people saw Oil States and choked. Many said “OK Todd now what?” – I laughed. I have always said an “IP issuance from the Government under Title 35 in the US is a Contractual Franchise” between the Federal Government and a Private Citizen, an Entity, or its Assignee’s.

SCOTUS agreed with me. According to the Supreme Court in Oil States, right or wrong, the issuance of a US Patent and Copyright is a contract. A contract between the Government and the party its granted to. A Monopolistic Contract as well since it imparts exclusivity into the situation. Luckily contracts have value.

When they are set aside based on an IPR or related matter which takes enforcement rights away from their owners, their owners are entitled to the damage you would receive from those enforcement rights… As to how you know this – its in the Bankruptcy Code.

Government Contracts are special, they are contained by the FALSE CLAIMS ACT in unique ways, and now Patent and Copyright Fraud is as well. This is clearly an unintended consequence, but a consequence none the less.

Historically, in our matter we contributed the Location Based Services (LBS) component called PHASE-II IP as an already protected IP to the Joint Filing done by Microsemi on our behalf, meaning our IP rights to that protected IP predated the filing of the patent itself.

The US6370629 Settlement retains full ownership of PHASE-II IP, and that has impact here.

As to why our IP rights are superior for the Location Based Service component of US6370629 called “Phase-II IP”,  Microsemi’s predecessor (Datum) got the IP from us under those previous rights “as defined in the Settlement” and one of those is a notice that we still are the sole owners of PHASE-II IP.  Those rights are not tied to the Patent but to a NDA/Trade-secret controlled publication and later to a Copyright Controlled Publication.

Hence, ultimately today, whether US6370629 ever issued is irreverent now. Parties using PHASE-II IP based location based services in their derivative patents and settlements are fully bound by the Mechanism they Got that IP Through, an Microsemi’s rights in its ability to unbundle it for use in any form.

DERIVATIVES:  What does this actually mean? Arguably – McNeil and I (and PRA) own both the licensing for our Phase-II IP inside the Patent and externally to it based on its proper publication under the Software Copyright Act and the Berne Treaty. In fact this is true.

But because US6370629 did issue, the world got most of their licensing through Microsemis exposing our Copyright Controlled Phase-II IP in the US6370629 Filing.

Because of this, the end users (all users) are as such limited to the enforcement terms which mandate Section 8 compliance.

It also means that Derivative Users with their on Patent applied for derivatives are bound by the licensing Microsemi obtained to control their filing of th Patent. I.e. Section 8 Controls.

 

Phase-II based products are all controlled under Section 8 of the Settlement.

Apple, Facebook, Google, Microsoft and all their products using Phase-II IP  which was copyrighted before Microsemi filed fore the patent, are still bound therein. And until the Supreme Court sets aside the Software Copyright Act of 1980  or Congress amends it herein, it controls here. Datum  were contained from use in all matters by Section8 of the Patent Settlement. We were not.

Since that IP Transfer Agreement predates the Patent Issuance and has nothing to do with whether the Patent Issues or not, MicroSemi’s rights are tied to the Patent Settlement Agreement and what it provides them with, but ours are not.

All the derivatives published and core extensions in the form of Softwares are controlled as such. Hence,  California’s role “in the alleged Taking and Inverse Condemnation for US6370629 and those State Actor’s use of the Phase-II IP in softwares outside the terms of the Settlement” is perfected therein.  Oil States is a blessing for us in disguise.

The Patent Settlement says any and all derivative uses. Whether PTAB IPR happens, whether the Patent Issues, or not are irrelevant to softwares using Phase-II IP. They are controlled by the Software Licensing Model Microsemi got to file the Patent from. It is that simple.

The State breached that contract and prevented its enforcement against State Actors.

IPR Invalidated Patents used in Offshoring are a CRIME: It gets better though, California allowed parties to offshore the bulk of the money they were paying themselves through the infamous Double-Irish bookkeeping fraud, for licensing our IP.

In any instance where one of those Derivatives is subjected to an IPR (Inter Parties Review before the PTAB) which sets aside a Patent which was used in OFFSHORING, or reduces or sets its claims aside, that means any money paid to an OFFSHORE entity needs to come back to the US properly and be taxed.

Think about that… If the Patent used to Offshore those moneys is attacked and invalidated it means every dime the Big-4 sent overseas must come home.

Meaning the F211’s we filed were just made enforceable by the US Supreme Court… No really guys… It is true.  Gotta Love the SCOTUS.

From a Court Ethics and the Six Judicial Cannons perspective – they were clearly set aside in our case and that also needs review.

We have never asked for anything unreasonable. Just compensation for the Inverse Condemnation per the law. The State and its Courts have blocked that at every turn, and never denied it is doing so. Just statements verbally “that its wants to permanently prevent our rights from being enforced and it doesn’t want to pay for those takings”. So it through a Motion from the State AG’s office ruled we were vexatious litigants. That is a problem as well.

As to the VEXATIOUS LITIGANT RULING against Michael and I, all we have ever tried to do is to get people to review the requirements of Section 8 of the Settlement and to review that BOTH SIGNATORIES TO THE SETTLEMENT agreed that any and all people using the IP will be bound by those terms until those Settlements are renegotiated.

We even tried to have the Settlements or their Terms set aside,in the 14-CV-03629/WHA matter, and the Court refused. So they are judicially perfect now!

Our Goal

Our intent isn’t to become the most wealthiest people in America or on Planet Earth, but to properly get the State to pay us for what it took.

That, and as another issue we want to raise awareness that “the onshoring of those moneys stripped from the US Economy”  and encourage the closing the loopholes that are allowing the frauds. This is about saving America. Oil States v Green Energy Products SCOTUS ruling opens this door wide too.

As to how that Double-Irish Fraud worked it allowed American money to be offshored such that the real Retained Net Wealth from each $1000 of commercial commerce was about $40/USD by our model.

No one so far in any State Agency has been willing to refute that number or tell us we are wrong. $40/$1000. Then subtract Staff Salaries and Facilities or Materials Operations from that. We figure about 4c/$ is what Apple and the others retained as their US Divisions Net Profits.

If we are wrong in that we will surely apologize but ask yourself “How much money does this actually leave in US Banks then” The answer is almost none.

The funniest part of this is how many Politicians want the damage to continue.

 

MY STORY: Life is so complex – in my case all because of a set of Patent Frauds.

My complex life…

Most peoples lives are complex these days. They are worried about making their rent or mortgage payment. The are worried about their Jobs. They are worried about their Lover/S.O./Mate… Their focus is on the complexity of their own situation.

For most all this stress is amplified by their tacit awareness of the things happening in distant lands which they would not approve of had they the actual ability to do something about it. Instead they are forced by their day to day existence to focus on the everyday grind their lives represent.

The Patent Frauds

My life is complex because of a set of Patent Frauds which we are going to talk about in this Blog. Patent Frauds the US Government (the Federal Government) and the State of California, are actively invested in covering up their actions. These frauds today control virtually every computer on Earth. They are tied to two Patents. One is US6370629 and the other is US6393126.

These are even more complicated by a legal matter in the Courts of Santa Cruz County called Glassey/McNeil v State of California (17-CV-01908/WHA) which this perjury-law-constrained declaration pertains to.

As to what this is all about – its digital timestamping and the control of Location Based Services (from US6370619 and US6393126) illegally used in virtually all commercial software today.

The CORE TIMESTAMPING SEP (Standards Enabling Patent)

US6370629: (see conformed copy of US6370629 here) In the first case, I hired a gentleman from a company called Digital Delivery Inc (DDI) named Mark Hastings and his Attorneys Fish and Richards, to file the Patent for me and my partner Mr. McNeil. Their names are fully displayed in the ASSIGNMENT documents for the patents original filing, which is a key part of the Public Patent Wrapper (file) so there is no issue with naming all the parties here in the press.

The Filing of US6370629 – a Work for Hire agreement gone horribly wrong

Mr. Hastings came to us and proposed sometime after the original verbal deal and their terms were done for his company to file my LBS (Location Based Service) payent, that we could cut the processing time from three (3) years to a single Year by filing it as an amendment to an amendment to existing patent protected IP (US5646992) that DDI owned.

We were very concerned about the complexity of this and commingling of the IP Rights, but to convince us his counsel  falsely represented how easy it is to segment enforcement rights in a jointly owned Patent to us to “get our approval” on their plan.

They (Hastings and the Attrorney’s  Fish and Richards) also were absolutely adamant that the filing would amend within one Calendar Year – verbally of course, and this was the reason we trusted them. Bad mistake… Relax all of our names are in the public records in the Patent Wrapper and numerous court filings, so there is no issue here talking in public today.

The US6370629 Filing Fraud

They (Fish and Richards LLP acting for Hastings) apparently then filed the CONTROLLING ACCESS PATENT as it is referred to “as fully assigned when it was only Conditionally Assigned”. I finally got PTO to amend the original filing in June of 2013, by submitting the actual contracts (which are not part of the File Wrapper). These show the original filing was only Conditionally Assigned, and this alone would have stopped it from being transferred to any third party without the conditions being met as just one instance of the controls it was to be administered under.

As to why it is only conditionally assigned, the Agreement calls for an Enlightenment period of  a period of one Calendar Year. Further, there is a NON-TRANSFERABILITY CLAUSE which also constrains rights which survive the original limited assignment. See Pages 4 and 5 of this document as the actual retainer agreement. It is improperly called the CO-INVENTOR Agreement because it is actually a Patent Filing Retainer with Deferred/Contingent Payment for services.

Sometime later in June of 1999 they also sold it with their company in violation of the Patent Filing Retainer Agreement’s non-transferability clause to a Company I was consulting for called DATUM Inc.

All of this is borne out by simple review of the content of the US6370629 FILE WRAPPER and various legal matters inside PACER today like USDC 14-CV-03629/WHA from San Francisco California’s USDC, so there is nothing defamatory in this statement.

Prior to the Settlement, and not disclosed in the DDI Settlement document, US6370629 was illegally filed in Australia, Brazil, Canada, the EU, and South Africa in 1999, and then two other illegal instances were filed in 2000 in Japan and South Korea. (see the Family List here)

All were abandoned and today the effects of selling any US6370629 softwares or those from any of the 275+ derivatives into those Nations causes a Fraud Loss, one which will continue to happen through the end of the Copyrights of those SW’s sometime in the Next Century.

In Apple’s case alone they have 46 derivatives which were never paid for or properly licensed under the Settlement Terms.

Microsoft itself is in a similar position with its unlicensed uses and the global fraud losses they cause. None were mentioned in the DDI Settlement in any form, nor paid for under the terms of the Settlement.

Further, no Section 8 Compliance Programs were ever set up for any of the main or derivative patents creating a staggering loss of scope which is into trillions of US Dollars over the 99 year lifetime of the copyrights the Settlement’s Section 8 terms control

US6393126: The second Patent itself should not exist. The Trusted Timing Infrastructure (TTI) Release does not allow for Patent Filings in any Form. Further, this IP inside 3126 is not enumerated in the Release and its inventory of what was included.

Rather it is “Other IP which was submitted to DATUM under an NDA” which they then functionally claimed ownership of and filed these four patent instances of (CA, EP, WO and the US2 filing). None were paid for, none are described as to the tech in the Trusted Timing Infrastructure Settlement, and there is no release on any of the International Filings. USPTO by the way also refused to correct the INVENTOR filings for US6393126 as well. Interesting how US DOC is actively involved in PATENT FRAUD.

Today the  TTI Settlement’s Terms control a key piece of equipment used in many Global Banking and related systems called the Thales Group eSecurity Timestamp server, which I believe is a key component of GCHQ and NSA Surveillance Systems. But hey I could be wrong. If that is true then the Five Eyes need a release (hey guys) since the US Government and its Publishing Houses were all stripped of their Sovereign Immunity in the USDC 14-CV-03629/WHA matter and the two appeals which perfected it (Ninth Circuit 14-17574, and DC Circuit 15-01326).

But ask yourselves “Why then would California and the US Government block any of the litigations which were legitimately filed to enforce Section 8 of the Settlements terms“? Fair Question. If you can get them to answer this please let me know.

 

CONGRESS BLOWS OFF THE CONSTITUTION – CONVERTS GLASSEY/MCNEIL IP

Even the US Congress itself has refused to be bound to the effects of the USDC Ruling and its Unintended Consequences, ones which perfected the third party requirements from USDC 14-CV-03629/WHA.

No legal professional has disagreed that the Third Party Requirements are real, or that the IP management requirements would cost everyone Billions of US Dollars per year.

Further, no one has said that this specific thing is not what impacted the 2014 and 2016 elections in the US. In fact all they will say is that third parties attacked the Election through some Advertisements. Is that ludicrous or what? Hmm…

So what is really going on with property and loss processing in the US? I cant even get IRS (you remember them) to process Fraud Losses even though they clearly say I don’t owe them any money. In fact my/our losses are computed at above $60B USD per calendar year on the Operations of the US Stock and Trading Exchange Framework alone. My partners and I are out almost 1T USD at this model, against the US Securities Framework over the last 17 years, and the losses will continue into 2080 or the next Century depending on whose model you use.

Again, it is what it is…