BRIEF: Is Maria Butina being illegally detained?

The unanswered questions:

IANAL but… our analysis still stands:  There is an interesting question which US State and US DOJ are avoiding answering. That being if they (DOJ) Formally Granted ALL parties (including Maria) Legal Immunity for any and all uses of US6370629, how does that affect documents filed (or not filed) with the US Government. Here is our Brief on the Transactional Immunity (See USAM at 725) created formally by the Judge in 14-03629/WHA

The real question is whether the US DOJ has confused her because of her Red Hair with Anna Chapman who they deported for being a spy some time ago

 

The FBI and DOJ claims

The FBI says Maria Butina failed to properly register as a Russian Government Agent when she entered the US. But she is not employed as either a Government Run Lobbyist, or a Russian Government Employee.

Quite the opposite she is a Russian Citizen attending school in the US and working on developing a NRA like entity in Russia, which would make her a Lobbyist in Russia as opposed to one in the US.  Maria likes to shoot. All types of Guns. And she is pretty good at it too after looking at her scores.  So 

Further, the FBI itself through their Counter-terrorism and Counter-espionage groups in Washington DC submitted an Arrest Warrant application with a Charging Brief specifying that Maria used Electronic Media to communicate with parties to further the Interests of the Russian Government. And (here it comes) she offered SEX for FAVORS – a claim they have since retreated from.  So No SEX… which seems to eliminate the RED SPARROW claim fully.

The problem is the Ruling from USDC 14-03629/WHA which USDOJ and its own Law Enforcement teams are granted Judicial Immunity from meeting the key terms of.

So lets look at both FBI/DOJ and States arguments.

  1. The evidence of the alleged communications isnt legally admissible under the US6370629/Fraud Immunity program which applies Transactional Immunity to any and all uses of US6370629 in the US.
  2. Any EMAIL Sent by Maria saying ANYTHING is inadmissible in any Court under any Warrant request, including before the FISA Court itself because of its using US6370629 IP inside.
  3. Any Telephone Communications over any Digital Telecommunications Network using US6370629 IP inside the systems, has the same Immunity.
  4. In summarizing – how does US DOJ prosecute anyone for any Digital Evidence in any form using US6370629 IP inside?

Seems to me, as the creator of US6370629, that US DOJ boxed itself into a corner here, and no matter what – whether Maria is another Anna Chapman or not, she cant be prosecuted with the evidence in anyones possession now. Hmmm… Then DOJ should let Maria go and send her Home in time for the first Snow which should happen in the next month or so in Russia.